Next Hearing on 29th March

At last DAE adminstrative officer submitted a reply on to the CAT petition that we had filed on 18th March,2010

The next hearing is on 29th MARCH 2010. The following is a copy of the notification for next hearing


           CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, MADRAS BENCH
TO BE HEARD ON MONDAY THE 29TH DAY OF MARCH 2010 AT 10.30 A.M.
          ------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    BEFORE
          HON BLE SHRI K.ELANGO - JUDICIAL MEMBER
                                                    AND
 HON BLE SHRI R.SATAPATHY - ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
                          ( SITTING IN COURT HALL NO. 1 )
                                                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TO BE PRONOUNCED BY HON'BLE SHRI R. SATAPATHI .... MEMBER (ADMN)
 
37. OA.1177/2009   DR.DEEPAK SEN & 14 ORS    MRS.VEDAVALLI KUMAR

(Scale of Pay) ..VS... -   SECY.,M/O H&FW,            MR.K.M.VENUGOPAL
                                                         ND & 4 ORS

I have discussed the DAE response with our Doctors from various states and given  a consolidated opinion to our lawyer.
In brief we have told the lawer not to waste Courts time on the answers given by AO III  on unrelated topics raised by the Department as  the response did not pertain to our petition.
 We have asked for implementaion of DACP as recomended by the 6CPC following which a cabinet approval was given and  OM issued by DH&FW . The govt issued seperate orders for CHS Doctors and Central Govt Doctors. I have also added a RTI response from ministry of health which has categorically stated that DACP has to be implimaented by all Ministries and Departments for all Doctors in Organised and isolated posts. It also has stated that Doctors of DAE Hospital , Kalppakm are eligible for DACP.
 
The diversonory tactics of the Department like housing , school, transport  though the lawer has been equipped with documentry evidence counteracting departments claim we have requested lawyer not to rais ethe issues and only respond if the opposition lawyer insists on dicussing this issues.